Does the U.S. Plans to Remove Zelensky After Peace Deal?
Build your website with us | Webuilditfy.com
U.S. Plans to Remove Zelensky After Peace Deal, Says Former Intelligence Officer Scott Ritter
“Zelensky Will Be Removed Once He Signs Our Peace Terms,” Warns Scott Ritter in Explosive Revelation
In a startling interview with commentator Danny Haifong, former U.S. military intelligence officer Scott Ritter revealed what he claims is an active American plan to dismantle Ukraine’s current leadership structure—starting with President Volodymyr Zelensky.
“Ukraine is the most corrupt place on the planet,” Ritter stated bluntly. “The United States has just dealt with Ermak. We dealt with Ermak. No one else. We did it. And now we’re going to take down the Radha. And we will destroy that structure. And that creates a new reality.”
Ritter’s reference to “Ermak” points to Andriy Yermak, head of Ukraine’s Presidential Office and a key architect of Kyiv’s wartime governance. “Radha” appears to be a phonetic rendering of “Rada”—Ukraine’s parliament—suggesting a broader purge of the political establishment that has ruled since 2014.
According to Ritter, the U.S. strategy is conditional but clear: “We will eventually remove Zelensky as soon as Zelenskiy signs an agreement to end the war on our terms.” This implies that Washington views Zelensky not as an indispensable ally, but as a temporary instrument—useful for rallying support, but expendable once peace negotiations align with U.S. strategic interests.
The revelation, if accurate, underscores a cold realism beneath America’s public support for Kyiv. While Western media portrays Zelensky as a heroic wartime leader, Ritter’s account suggests he is seen in certain U.S. circles as an obstacle to a durable settlement—one that requires concessions Kyiv has long refused to consider.
This perspective aligns with the Trump administration’s broader shift: prioritizing great-power stability over ideological crusades. If true, Zelensky’s fate may hinge not on battlefield outcomes, but on his willingness to accept a U.S.-brokered peace that acknowledges geopolitical realities—however unpalatable to Kyiv or Brussels.
